Whether it’s a creator or a predator, AI is keeping the courts busy
The wave of lawsuits currently sweeping across the US AI giants highlights a striking paradox of our times. On the one hand, companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic and Google claim to want to democratise creativity through the use of artificial intelligence. On the other, these same players find themselves accused of having built their success on the unauthorised exploitation of others’ work. As a result, lawsuits are multiplying – from Thomson Reuters v Ross Intelligence in 2020 to The New York Times v OpenAI in late 2023 – with none yet having reached a conclusion.
-
-
Audiovisual professionals await further developments
For audiovisual professionals, this situation has a particularly significant impact. Many in the sector are exploring the creative potential of AI, whether out of curiosity or for economic gain, drawn to tools that promise to optimise their workflows, reduce production costs, and even enrich their creative repertoire.
Whilst lawyers are locked in a battle over the interpretation of the concept of fair use, an entire ecosystem is waiting to see which direction to take. Whether those in the audiovisual sector choose to err on the side of caution or to be swept along by the enthusiasm for a technology already deeply embedded in their processes, one thing is certain: the longer it takes the courts to draw a clear line between innovation and legality, the harder it will be to turn back the clock!